Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Scott Robinson's avatar

A wonderful, reflective and informative piece Julia. I appreciate the anthropological evolution of the self from baby to adulthood. It all makes sense. My question would be though: on what epistemological basis do we know that babies have no sense of self? Is this just through intuitive inquiry, or something else?

I also valued your honest analysis on the role of the ego, which so often gets burnished in traditional spiritual discourse. Thank you.

markscott757's avatar

Hey Julia.

Hope your doing ok!? I know I haven't commented on your beautiful writing pieces directly for a little while but I now feel drawn to write a very brief response to your wonderful article titled, why you can't just "Be Here Now." I think your words on this piece was a lovely reflection on the anthropological evolution that takes place during the early years of our existence which tends to define our main life patterns by the age of 7 which includes for many ( as you make referense to), the ultimate sense of Self.

Then for many of us (often somewhere between the 3rd and 5th of our 7 year life cycle periods of growth and maturity we, if fortunate enough, wake up to the problems of the Ego in relation to growth and the ability to reside in conscious awareness, spending a big part or the remainder of our existence trying to loosen and separate the shackles that bound us with our Ego to allow us to behave and react from a place of presence.

I particularly loved your analogy in your 4th from last paragraph beginning, "An Opening is wonderful and threatening" This is beautifully succinct and wonderfully descriptive writing here Julia.

However I also just wanted to say a brief few words on Almaas and the Ridhwan School, both of which I have had an awareness of since the book, "Facets of Unity" which I first read around 20 Years ago.

Whilst I don't particularly disagree with anything that Almaas mentions within his considerable cannon of work or any of the Ridhwan Philosophies per se, I have a slight concern with the belief of the absolute exclusivity of the Knowledge provided ( both from Almaas's Books and Ridhwan Literature). I find both to be a little exclusive regarding everything else avaliable out there, as if the Author and his Group is afraid of someone finding more relavent information elsewhere that would deconstruct their validity or place within history as the One and only Correct Route in the search for Conscious Awareness and Enlightenment.

It reminds me of exactly what used to happen when Indian Yoga practices traversed to the West in the early Eighties and Teachers required you to sign up exclusively with them and forbade attendance to other Classes for fear of the Teachers way and method to be questioned in any way shape or form.

It was exactly the same during my own Journey through and with the Taoist Arts in the late 80's to the early 2000's for fear of exposure over abilities in addition to a sometimes deliberate misinformation or withholding of information to protect the exclusivity of the info and thereby the need for a Teacher or Master in the first place.

A bit of a long ramble Julia to say I try to read everything with an open mind and cherry pick the good bits whilst excluding nothing completely, but additionally never assuming that their is only one right way or better way or only way.

I think everyone has in the main something to say or something to communicate. And whilst everyone may not get it or attune with it then, they probably weren't meant to.

However they'll no doubt then in every possibility find something else that aligns with them further on down the road.

Horses for Courses.

Again not withstanding my long rambling response; Loved your article.

Keep up the fabulous writing.

Mark. 🌠😚

13 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?